Skip to Content
Merck
  • A randomized clinical trial of intravitreal bevacizumab versus intravitreal dexamethasone for diabetic macular edema: the BEVORDEX study.

A randomized clinical trial of intravitreal bevacizumab versus intravitreal dexamethasone for diabetic macular edema: the BEVORDEX study.

Ophthalmology (2014-08-27)
Mark C Gillies, Lyndell L Lim, Anna Campain, Godfrey J Quin, Wedad Salem, Ji Li, Stephanie Goodwin, Christine Aroney, Ian L McAllister, Samantha Fraser-Bell
ABSTRACT

To report the 12-month results of the first head-to-head comparison of a dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex; Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) versus bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) for center-involving diabetic macular edema (DME). Phase 2, prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-masked clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01298076). We enrolled 88 eyes of 61 patients with center-involving DME. Forty-two eyes were randomized to receive bevacizumab every 4 weeks and 46 eyes were randomized to receive a dexamethasone implant every 16 weeks, both pro re nata. Results were analyzed using linear regression with generalized estimation equation methods to account for between-eye correlation. The primary outcome was the proportion of eyes that improved vision by 10 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution letters. Secondary outcomes included mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), change in central macular thickness (CMT), injection frequency, and adverse events. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using the Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) questionnaire. Improvement in BCVA of 10 or more letters was found in 17 of 42 eyes (40%) treated with bevacizumab compared with 19 of 46 dexamethasone implant-treated eyes (41%; P = 0.83). None of the 42 bevacizumab eyes lost 10 letters or more, whereas 5 of 46 (11%) dexamethasone implant eyes did, mostly because of cataract. Mean CMT decreased by 122 μm for bevacizumab eyes and by 187 μm for dexamethasone implant eyes (P = 0.015). Bevacizumab-treated eyes received a mean of 8.6 injections compared with 2.7 injections for dexamethasone implant eyes. Significant improvement in IVI scores occurred for both treatment groups. Dexamethasone implant achieved similar rates of visual acuity improvement compared with bevacizumab for DME, with superior anatomic outcomes and fewer injections. Both treatments were associated with improvement in visual quality-of-life scores. However, more dexamethasone implant-treated eyes lost vision, mainly because of cataract.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Supelco
Dexamethasone solution, 1.0 mg/mL in methanol, ampule of 1 mL, certified reference material, Cerilliant®
Dexamethasone for peak identification, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Dexamethasone, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Supelco
Dexamethasone, VETRANAL®, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Dexamethasone, tested according to Ph. Eur.
Sigma-Aldrich
Dexamethasone, powder, γ-irradiated, BioXtra, suitable for cell culture, ≥80% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Dexamethasone, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, ≥97%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dexamethasone, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Dexamethasone, ≥98% (HPLC), powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Dexamethasone-Water Soluble, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Supelco
Dexamethasone, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Dexamethasone for system suitability, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard