Our broad portfolio consists of multiplex panels that allow you to choose, within the panel, analytes that best meet your needs. On a separate tab you can choose the premixed cytokine format or a single plex kit.
Cell Signaling Kits & MAPmates™
Choose fixed kits that allow you to explore entire pathways or processes. Or design your own kits by choosing single plex MAPmates™, following the provided guidelines.
The following MAPmates™ should not be plexed together:
-MAPmates™ that require a different assay buffer
-Phospho-specific and total MAPmate™ pairs, e.g. total GSK3β and GSK3β (Ser 9)
-PanTyr and site-specific MAPmates™, e.g. Phospho-EGF Receptor and phospho-STAT1 (Tyr701)
-More than 1 phospho-MAPmate™ for a single target (Akt, STAT3)
-GAPDH and β-Tubulin cannot be plexed with kits or MAPmates™ containing panTyr
.
Catalogue Number
Ordering Description
Qty/Pack
List
This item has been added to favorites.
Select A Species, Panel Type, Kit or Sample Type
To begin designing your MILLIPLEX® MAP kit select a species, a panel type or kit of interest.
Custom Premix Selecting "Custom Premix" option means that all of the beads you have chosen will be premixed in manufacturing before the kit is sent to you.
Catalogue Number
Ordering Description
Qty/Pack
List
This item has been added to favorites.
Species
Panel Type
Selected Kit
Qty
Catalogue Number
Ordering Description
Qty/Pack
List Price
96-Well Plate
Qty
Catalogue Number
Ordering Description
Qty/Pack
List Price
Add Additional Reagents (Buffer and Detection Kit is required for use with MAPmates)
Qty
Catalogue Number
Ordering Description
Qty/Pack
List Price
48-602MAG
Buffer Detection Kit for Magnetic Beads
1 Kit
Space Saver Option Customers purchasing multiple kits may choose to save storage space by eliminating the kit packaging and receiving their multiplex assay components in plastic bags for more compact storage.
This item has been added to favorites.
The Product Has Been Added To Your Cart
You can now customize another kit, choose a premixed kit, check out or close the ordering tool.
Attention: We have moved. Merck Millipore products are no longer available for purchase on MerckMillipore.com.Learn More
Voltage-gated sodium channels (Na(v) channels) in retinal neurons are known to contribute to the mammalian flash electroretinogram (ERG) via activity of third-order retinal neurons, i.e. amacrine and ganglion cells. This study investigated the effects of tetrodotoxin (TTX) blockade of Na(v) channels on the b-wave, an ERG wave that originates mainly from activity of second-order retinal neurons. ERGs were recorded from anaesthetized Brown Norway rats in response to brief full-field flashes presented over a range of stimulus energies, under dark-adapted conditions and in the presence of steady mesopic and photopic backgrounds. Recordings were made before and after intravitreal injection of TTX (approximately 3 microm) alone, 3-6 weeks after optic nerve transection (ONTx) to induce ganglion cell degeneration, or in combination with an ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonist 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX, 200 microm) to block light-evoked activity of inner retinal, horizontal and OFF bipolar cells, or with the glutamate agonist N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA, 100-200 microm) to reduce light-evoked inner retinal activity. TTX reduced ERG amplitudes measured at fixed times corresponding to b-wave time to peak. Effects of TTX were seen under all background conditions, but were greatest for mesopic backgrounds. In dark-adapted retina, b-wave amplitudes were reduced only when very low stimulus energies affecting the inner retina, or very high stimulus energies were used. Loss of ganglion cells following ONTx did not affect b-wave amplitudes, and injection of TTX in eyes with ONTx reduced b-wave amplitudes by the same amount for each background condition as occurred when ganglion cells were intact, thereby eliminating a ganglion cell role in the TTX effects. Isolation of cone-driven responses by presenting test flashes after cessation of a rod-saturating conditioning flash indicated that the TTX effects were primarily on cone circuits contributing to the mixed rod-cone ERG. NMDA significantly reduced only the additional effects of TTX on the mixed rod-cone ERG observed under mesopic conditions, implicating inner retinal involvement in those effects. After pharmacological blockade with CNQX, TTX still reduced b-wave amplitudes in cone-isolated ERGs indicating Na(v) channels in ON cone bipolar cells themselves augment b-wave amplitude and sensitivity. This augmentation was largest under dark-adapted conditions, and decreased with increasing background illumination, indicating effects of background illumination on Na(v) channel function. These findings indicate that activation of Na(v) channels in ON cone bipolar cells affects the b-wave of the rat ERG and must be considered when analysing results of ERG studies of retinal function.
PURPOSE: To examine the impact of aging and age-related maculopathy (ARM) on the activation of phototransduction in rod photoreceptors by measuring the a-wave of the flash, full-field electroretinogram (ERG). METHODS: Enrollees consisted of older adults (> or = 60 years of age) in normal retinal health (n = 41) and those with early (n = 39) or late ARM (n = 7), in whom disease presence and severity were defined based on grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs according to the Wisconsin Age-Related Maculopathy grading system. Young adults (ages 16-30 years; n = 27) were enrolled for comparison purposes. Previously established procedures were used to estimate the ERG response to two families of flash intensities. By computer subtraction of responses, the isolated rod response was identified. Each participant's ensemble rod responses were fit with the following equation to describe the response (R) as function of flash intensity (I), and time (t): R(I,t) = [1 - exp[-I x S x (t - td)2]] x RmP3, where S is sensitivity, td is the delay before onset of the a-wave, and Rm(P3) is the maximum amplitude. RESULTS: In analyses of older adults, there was no impact of early ARM presence or severity on log S, Rm(P3), or td after adjustment for age and intraocular lens presence. Differences between young and old normal subjects in log S, RmP3, and td disappeared when analyses were limited to older adults with intraocular lenses. CONCLUSIONS: When the light absorption of the aged lens is taken into account and reliable definitions of normal retinal aging and ARM are used, the activation of the a-wave as measured by the rod-mediated full-field ERG is not affected by early ARM, nor is it impacted by normal retinal aging.