Po zamknięciu konfiguracja nie zostanie zapisana, chyba że artykuł zostanie dodany do koszyka lub do ulubionych.
Kliknij OK, aby zamknąć narzędzie MILLIPLEX® MAP lub Anuluj, aby wrócić do wyboru.
Wybierz personalizowane panele i wstępnie zmieszane zestawy – LUB – MAPmates™ do sygnalizacji komórkowej
Zaprojektuj i wyceń swoje zestawy MILLIPLEX® MAP.
Panele podlegające personalizacji i zestawy wstępnie zmieszane
Nasza szeroka gama produktów składa się z paneli multipleksów, które pozwalają Ci wybierać, w ramach panelu, anality, które najlepiej pasują do Twoich potrzeb. W oddzielnej zakładce można wybrać wstępnie zmieszane cytokiny lub zestaw pojedynczego pleksu.
Zestawy dot. sygnalizacji komórkowej oraz MAPmates™
Wybierz gotowe zestawy, które pozwolą Ci badać całe szlaki lub procesy. Lub zaprojektuj swoje własne zestawy, wybierając jednopleksowe MAPmates™, zgodnie z podanymi wytycznymi.
Następujących MAPmates™ nie należy łączyć: -MAPmates™, które wymagają innego buforu do oznaczenia -Fosfospecyficzne i całkowite pary MAPmate™, np. całkowite GSK3β oraz GSK3β (Ser 9) -PanTyr i MAPmates™ specyficzne względem miejsca, np. receptora fosfo-EGF i fosfo-STAT1 (Tyr701) -Więcej niż 1 phospho-MAPmate™ dla jednego celu (Akt, STAT3) -GAPDH oraz β-Tubulin nie mogą być łączone z zestawami lub MAPmates™ zawierającymi panTyr
.
Numer katalogowy
Opis zamawiania
Ilość/opak.
Lista
Ten artykuł został dodany do ulubionych.
Wybierz gatunek, typ panelu, zestaw lub rodzaj próbki
Aby rozpocząć projektowanie zestawu MILLIPLEX® MAP, należy wybrać gatunek, typ panelu lub interesujący nas zestaw.
Custom Premix Selecting "Custom Premix" option means that all of the beads you have chosen will be premixed in manufacturing before the kit is sent to you.
Catalogue Number
Ordering Description
Qty/Pack
List
Ten artykuł został dodany do ulubionych.
Gatunek
Typ panelu
Wybrany zestaw
Ilość
Numer katalogowy
Opis zamawiania
Ilość/opak.
Lista cen
96-Well Plate
Ilość
Numer katalogowy
Opis zamawiania
Ilość/opak.
Lista cen
Dodaj dodatkowe odczynniki (Do użycia z MAPmates wymagany jest bufor i zestaw do detekcji)
Ilość
Numer katalogowy
Opis zamawiania
Ilość/opak.
Lista cen
48-602MAG
Buffer Detection Kit for Magnetic Beads
1 Kit
Opcja oszczędzająca miejsce Klienci kupujący kilka zestawów mogą wybrać oszczędność przestrzeni koniecznej do przechowywania przez eliminację opakowania zestawu i otrzymanie komponentów oznaczenia multipleksowego w plastikowych torbach, co umożliwi bardziej kompaktowe przechowywanie.
Ten artykuł został dodany do ulubionych.
Produkt został dodany do koszyka
Możesz teraz spersonalizować inny zestaw, wybrać zestaw wstępnie przygotowany, wylogować się lub zamknąć zamówienie.
Attention: We have moved. Merck Millipore products are no longer available for purchase on MerckMillipore.com.Learn More
The inability of chlorine to completely inactivate human bacterial pathogens on whole and fresh-cut produce suggests a need for other antimicrobial washing treatments. Nisin (50 microg/ml) and pediocin (100 AU/ml) individually or in combination with sodium lactate (2%), potassium sorbate (0.02%), phytic acid (0.02%), and citric acid (10 mM) were tested as possible sanitizer treatments for reducing the population of Listeria monocytogenes on cabbage, broccoli, and mung bean sprouts. Cabbage, broccoli, and mung bean sprouts were inoculated with a five-strain cocktail of L. monocytogenes at 4.61, 4.34, and 4.67 log CFU/g, respectively. Inoculated produce was left at room temperature (25 degrees C) for up to 4 h before antimicrobial treatment. Washing treatments were applied to inoculated produce for 1 min, and surviving bacterial populations were determined. When tested alone, all compounds resulted in 2.20- to 4.35-log reductions of L. monocytogenes on mung bean, cabbage, and broccoli, respectively. The combination treatments nisin-phytic acid and nisin-pediocin-phytic acid caused significant (P < 0.05) reductions of L. monocytogenes on cabbage and broccoli but not on mung bean sprouts. Pediocin treatment alone or in combination with any of the organic acid tested was more effective in reducing L. monocytogenes populations than the nisin treatment alone. Although none of the combination treatments completely eliminated the pathogen on the produce, the results suggest that some of the treatments evaluated in this study can be used to improve the microbial safety of fresh-cut cabbage, broccoli, and mung bean sprouts.
Hypertrophic stimuli cause transcription of the proto-oncogene c-Myc (Myc). Prior work showed that myocardial knockout of c-Myc (Myc) attenuated hypertrophy and decreased expression of metabolic genes after aortic constriction. Accordingly, we assessed the interplay between Myc, substrate oxidation and cardiac function during early pressure overload hypertrophy. Mice with cardiac specific, inducible Myc knockout (MycKO-TAC) and non-transgenic littermates (Cont-TAC) were subjected to transverse aortic constriction (TAC; n = 7/group). Additional groups underwent sham surgery (Cont-Sham and MycKO-Sham, n = 5 per group). After two weeks, function was measured in isolated working hearts along with substrate fractional contributions to the citric acid cycle by using perfusate with 13C labeled mixed fatty acids, lactate, ketone bodies and unlabeled glucose and insulin. Cardiac function was similar between groups after TAC although +dP/dT and -dP/dT trended towards improvement in MycKO-TAC versus Cont-TAC. In sham hearts, Myc knockout did not affect cardiac function or substrate preferences for the citric acid cycle. However, Myc knockout altered fractional contributions during TAC. The unlabeled fractional contribution increased in MycKO-TAC versus Cont-TAC, whereas ketone and free fatty acid fractional contributions decreased. Additionally, protein posttranslational modifications by O-GlcNAc were significantly greater in Cont-TAC versus both Cont-Sham and MycKO-TAC. In conclusion, Myc alters substrate preferences for the citric acid cycle during early pressure overload hypertrophy without negatively affecting cardiac function. Myc also affects protein posttranslational modifications by O-GlcNAc during hypertrophy, which may regulate Myc-induced metabolic changes.
Ethylene glycol monomethyl ether (EGME), sulpiride, and atrazine are known ovarian toxicants, which increase progesterone (P4) secretion and induce luteal cell hypertrophy following repeated administration. The aim of this study was to define the pathways by which these compounds exerted their effects on the ovary and hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. In the ovary, changes in the steroidogenic activity of new and old corpora lutea (CL) were addressed. EGME (300 mg/kg), sulpiride (100 mg/kg), or atrazine (300 mg/kg) were orally given daily for four times from proestrus to diestrus in normal cycling rats. Treatment with all chemicals significantly increased serum P4 levels, and EGME as well as sulpiride induced increases in prolactin (PRL) levels. In new CL, at both the gene and the protein levels, all three chemicals upregulated the following steroidogenic factors: scavenger receptor class B type I, steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, P450 cholesterol side-chain cleavage, and 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD) and downregulated the luteolytic gene, 20α-HSD. Coadministration of EGME and bromocriptine, a D2 agonist, completely inhibited PRL but not P4 secretion. Additionally, steroidogenic factor expression levels were upregulated, and 20α-HSD level was downregulated in new CL. These results suggest that EGME both directly and indirectly stimulates P4 production in luteal cells, whereas sulpiride elevates P4 through activation of PRL secretion in the pituitary. Atrazine may directly activate new CL by stimulating steroidogenic factor expressions. The present study suggests that multiple pathways mediate the effects of EGME, sulpiride, and atrazine on the HPG axis and luteal P4 production in female rats in vivo.
Anesthetics used in infants and children are implicated in the development of neurocognitive disorders. Although propofol induces neuroapoptosis in developing brain, the underlying mechanisms require elucidation and may have an energetic basis. We studied substrate utilization in immature swine anesthetized with either propofol or isoflurane for 4 hours. Piglets were infused with 13-Carbon-labeled glucose and leucine in the common carotid artery to assess citric acid cycle (CAC) metabolism in the parietal cortex. The anesthetics produced similar systemic hemodynamics and cerebral oxygen saturation by near-infrared spectroscopy. Compared with isoflurane, propofol depleted ATP and glycogen stores. Propofol decreased pools of the CAC intermediates, citrate, and α-ketoglutarate, while markedly increasing succinate along with decreasing mitochondrial complex II activity. Propofol also inhibited acetyl-CoA entry into the CAC through pyruvate dehydrogenase, while promoting glycolytic flux with marked lactate accumulation. Although oxygen supply appeared similar between the anesthetic groups, propofol yielded a metabolic phenotype that resembled a hypoxic state. Propofol impairs substrate flux through the CAC in the immature cerebral cortex. These impairments occurred without systemic metabolic perturbations that typically accompany propofol infusion syndrome. These metabolic abnormalities may have a role in the neurotoxity observed with propofol in the vulnerable immature brain.