290602
Dipropyl phthalate
98%
Synonym(s):
Di-n-Propyl phthalate, Dipropyl benzene-1,2-dicarboxylate
Sign In to View Organizational & Contract Pricing.
Select a Size
Change View
About This Item
Linear Formula:
C6H4-1,2-(CO2CH2CH2CH3)2
CAS Number:
Molecular Weight:
250.29
UNSPSC Code:
12352100
NACRES:
NA.22
PubChem Substance ID:
EC Number:
205-015-8
Beilstein/REAXYS Number:
2332522
MDL number:
Assay:
98%
Quality Level
assay
98%
refractive index
n20/D 1.497 (lit.)
bp
317.5 °C (lit.)
density
1.078 g/mL at 25 °C (lit.)
functional group
ester
SMILES string
CCCOC(=O)c1ccccc1C(=O)OCCC
InChI
1S/C14H18O4/c1-3-9-17-13(15)11-7-5-6-8-12(11)14(16)18-10-4-2/h5-8H,3-4,9-10H2,1-2H3
InChI key
MQHNKCZKNAJROC-UHFFFAOYSA-N
General description
Degradation of dipropyl phthalate by lypolytic enzymes (fungal cutinase, yeast esterase) has been investigated.
Dipropyl phthalate, also known as Dipropyl benzene-1,2-dicarboxylate, is an organic compound often used as a solvent and plasticizers.
Still not finding the right product?
Explore all of our products under Dipropyl phthalate
signalword
Warning
hcodes
Hazard Classifications
Repr. 2
Storage Class
10 - Combustible liquids
wgk
WGK 3
flash_point_f
228.2 °F - closed cup
flash_point_c
109 °C - closed cup
ppe
Eyeshields, Gloves, multi-purpose combination respirator cartridge (US)
Choose from one of the most recent versions:
Already Own This Product?
Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.
Yang-Hoon Kim et al.
Archives of microbiology, 184(1), 25-31 (2005-08-02)
The efficiency of two lypolytic enzymes (fungal cutinase, yeast esterase) in the degradation of dipropyl phthalate (DPrP) was investigated. The DPrP-degradation rate of fungal cutinase was surprisingly high, i.e., almost 70% of the initial DPrP (500 mg/l) was decomposed within
Reproductive toxicology. Di-n-propylphthalate.
Environmental health perspectives, 105 Suppl 1, 257-258 (1997-02-01)
K R Kumar et al.
Veterinary research communications, 24(7), 445-454 (2000-11-21)
Cows' urine was analysed by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The profiles from preovulatory, ovulatory and postovulatory samples were compared to establish any qualitative and quantitative differences that might have potential value in olfactory communication. Dichloromethane was used as the