Milli-Q® IQ 7000 Water Purification System product details: Learn more
Review – Love this instrument | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jason Holland Brewer Science
Rating: 4.7 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review – The machine is amazing! | ||
|---|---|---|
| Marissa Goetz University of Iowa
Rating: 4.3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review – User-friendly system | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jules Hammond BeFC
Rating: 4.7 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review – Solid investment | ||
|---|---|---|
| Trevor Fassbinder SGS
Rating: 4.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review – Excellent product! | ||
|---|---|---|
| Kelly Harden North Texas Municipal Water District
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review – Great Product | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dan DeLuca Teknor Apex
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review – Cleans up water for HPLC and ICP-MS | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beverly Suffolk GOJO Industries, Inc.
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review – Great to use when making mobile phase | ||
|---|---|---|
| Julian Moriones Valent Biosciences
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review – Very affordable! | ||
|---|---|---|
| Paul Heney WTWH Media Inc.
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Austin Angus Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jessica Kern University of Wyoming
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Srinivasan Krishnamoorthy University of Pretoria
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| James Hauenstein Bausch
Rating: 4.3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Zia Nuss Indiana University Genetics Biobank
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Julie Chang University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA)
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| John Oberman Pentagon Technologies
Rating: 4.3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jack King Bayer Consumer Care
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sonia Moisa Auburn University
Rating: 4.3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheri Goodall Indiana University
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Priya Ganguli California State University, Northridge
Rating: 4.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vincent Yu University of Houston
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jérôme Martinez bioMérieux
Rating: 3.7 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| James Fitzpatrick Washington University School of Medicine
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| qusay al-Mutalibi moh of iraq
Rating: 3,3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dennis Murphy Purdue Pharma
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ross Brown SNF-Polychemie
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Christian Amason Florida Department of Agriculture
Rating: 4.3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Stephanie Wimpey EPA
Rating: 4.7 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Gyorgy Lur University of California, Irvine
Rating: 3.3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Yasemin Sancak University of Washington
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Justin Weigold Waters Corp
Rating: 4.3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Brian Gregory Samford University
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lily T Georgia State University
Rating: 4.3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Abdul Rasheed War World Vegetable Center
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rosanna Delgaudio University of Naples Federico II
Rating: 4,3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mike Airola Stony Brook University
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Russell Drago Pfizer Inc.
Rating: 4.7 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mary Beth McCarthy UConn Health
Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable. |
Find more reviews at: www.selectscience.net.