306886
Ethyl 2-methylbutyrate
99%
Sign In to View Organizational & Contract Pricing.
Select a Size
Change View
About This Item
Linear Formula:
CH3CH2CH(CH3)COOC2H5
CAS Number:
Molecular Weight:
130.18
UNSPSC Code:
12352100
NACRES:
NA.22
PubChem Substance ID:
EC Number:
231-225-4
Beilstein/REAXYS Number:
1720887
MDL number:
Assay:
99%
Form:
liquid
Quality Level
assay
99%
form
liquid
refractive index
n20/D 1.397 (lit.)
bp
133 °C (lit.)
density
0.865 g/mL at 25 °C (lit.)
SMILES string
CCOC(=O)C(C)CC
InChI
1S/C7H14O2/c1-4-6(3)7(8)9-5-2/h6H,4-5H2,1-3H3
InChI key
HCRBXQFHJMCTLF-UHFFFAOYSA-N
General description
Ethyl 2-methylbutyrate is one of the key constituents of the aroma of baked wines. It is also a potential contributor to the aroma of fresh strawberry.
Still not finding the right product?
Explore all of our products under Ethyl 2-methylbutyrate
signalword
Warning
hcodes
Hazard Classifications
Flam. Liq. 3
Storage Class
3 - Flammable liquids
wgk
WGK 1
flash_point_f
78.8 °F - closed cup
flash_point_c
26 °C - closed cup
ppe
Eyeshields, Faceshields, Gloves, type ABEK (EN14387) respirator filter
Choose from one of the most recent versions:
Already Own This Product?
Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.
Vanda Pereira et al.
Food chemistry, 162, 122-134 (2014-05-31)
The evolution of monovarietal fortified Madeira wines forced-aged by traditional thermal processing (estufagem) were studied in terms of volatiles. SPE extracts were analysed by GC-MS before and after heating at 45 °C for 3 months (standard) and at 70 °C
Yong-Hyun Kim et al.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 13(6), 7939-7978 (2013-06-22)
The classes and concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOC) released from fresh and decaying strawberries were investigated and compared. In this study, a total of 147 strawberry volatiles were quantified before and after nine days of storage to explore differences
Saeedeh Noushini et al.
Scientific reports, 10(1), 19799-19799 (2020-11-15)
Diverse methods have been used to sample insect semiochemicals. Sampling methods can differ in efficiency and affinity and this can introduce significant biases when interpreting biological patterns. We compare common methods used to sample tephritid fruit fly rectal gland volatiles