451940
Sodium chloride-35Cl
99 atom % 35Cl
Sign In to View Organizational & Contract Pricing.
Select a Size
Change View
About This Item
Linear Formula:
Na35Cl
CAS Number:
Molecular Weight:
57.96
NACRES:
NA.12
PubChem Substance ID:
UNSPSC Code:
12142200
MDL number:
Isotopic purity:
99 atom % 35Cl
Mass shift:
depleted
isotopic purity
99 atom % 35Cl
Quality Level
mp
801 °C (lit.)
mass shift
depleted
SMILES string
[Na+].[35Cl-]
InChI
1S/ClH.Na/h1H;/q;+1/p-1/i1+0;
InChI key
FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-XUGDXVOUSA-M
Packaging
This product may be available from bulk stock and can be packaged on demand. For information on pricing, availability and packaging, please contact Stable Isotopes Customer Service.
signalword
Warning
hcodes
Hazard Classifications
Eye Irrit. 2 - Skin Irrit. 2 - STOT SE 3
Storage Class
11 - Combustible Solids
wgk
WGK 3
flash_point_f
Not applicable
flash_point_c
Not applicable
ppe
dust mask type N95 (US), Eyeshields, Gloves
Choose from one of the most recent versions:
Already Own This Product?
Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.
Laurent Dortet et al.
Journal of clinical microbiology, 52(7), 2359-2364 (2014-04-25)
Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates, particularly those that produce carbapenemases, are increasingly reported worldwide. The biochemically based Carba NP test, extensively validated for the detection of carbapenemase producers among Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp., has been modified to detect carbapenemase production in
Frédéric Lebrun-Julien et al.
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 34(25), 8432-8448 (2014-06-21)
The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway integrates multiple signals and regulates crucial cell functions via the molecular complexes mTORC1 and mTORC2. These complexes are functionally dependent on their raptor (mTORC1) or rictor (mTORC2) subunits. mTOR has been associated with
Alexander W Wyatt et al.
Genome biology, 15(8), 426-426 (2014-08-27)
Genomic analyses of hundreds of prostate tumors have defined a diverse landscape of mutations and genome rearrangements, but the transcriptomic effect of this complexity is less well understood, particularly at the individual tumor level. We selected a cohort of 25