Skip to Content
Merck
  • Comparison of succinimidyl [(125)I]iodobenzoate with iodogen iodination methods to study pharmacokinetics and ADME of biotherapeutics.

Comparison of succinimidyl [(125)I]iodobenzoate with iodogen iodination methods to study pharmacokinetics and ADME of biotherapeutics.

Pharmaceutical research (2014-05-23)
Jianqing Chen, Mengmeng Wang, Alison Joyce, David DeFranco, Mania Kavosi, Xin Xu, Denise M O'Hara
ABSTRACT

To assess the application of succinimidyl iodobenzoate (SIB) iodination method in labeling biotherapeutics to study their pharmacokinetics (PK) and biodistribution. An IgG molecule (protein-01) and a 40 KDa protein (protein-02) were evaluated. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and biodistribution of the radiolabeled IgG ((125)I-protein-01) in mice compared parameters from SIB and Iodogen protein iodination labeling methods. In addition, PK of radiolabeled 40 KDa protein ((125)I-protein-02) using SIB was compared with non-labeled protein-02 analyzed by ligand binding assay (LBA). Up to 72 h following a single IP injection to mice, the percentage of "free-label" determined by the soluble counts after TCA precipitation to total radioactivity in serum samples was 2.8-49.4% vs. <1.0% for (125)I-protein-01 iodinated via Iodogen or SIB methods, respectively, suggesting a higher in vivo stability of (125)I-protein-01 labeled via the SIB method. The serum exposure of (125)I-protein-01 was two-fold higher, and correspondingly, the tissue exposure was also higher (averaging 3.6 fold at 168 h) when using SIB protein labeling method than when using the Iodogen method. In addition, following subcutaneous (SC) administration to mice, the serum exposure of (125)I-protein-02 labeled via SIB method was similar to protein-02 measure by LBA. In this study, iodination of proteins using SIB methodology has overcome the dehalogenation problem in vivo which is inherent in Iodogen method, and PK parameters of a protein iodinated via SIB were comparable to the un-labeled protein measured by LBA. The SIB iodination method is an improved labeling approach for biotherapeutics used in studying PK and biodistribution characteristics.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydrogen sulfate
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, BioReagent, ≥99.93%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide, beads, 16-60 mesh, reagent grade, 97%
Supelco
Methanol, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, ≥99.5%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, natural, ≥99.5%, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, BioUltra, Molecular Biology, 10 M in H2O
Supelco
Methanol, analytical standard
Supelco
Acetic acid, analytical standard
Supelco
Sodium hydroxide concentrate, 0.1 M NaOH in water (0.1N), Eluent concentrate for IC
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide, BioXtra, ≥98% (acidimetric), pellets (anhydrous)
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, Absolute - Acetone free
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide, ACS reagent, ≥97.0%, pellets
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide, reagent grade, 97%, powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, ACS reagent, ≥99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 50% in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, ACS spectrophotometric grade, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, glacial, ReagentPlus®, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide, pellets, semiconductor grade, 99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, glacial, ACS reagent, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, HPLC Plus, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 5.0 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, ACS reagent, ≥99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide, puriss., meets analytical specification of Ph. Eur., BP, NF, E524, 98-100.5%, pellets
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, ACS reagent, ≥99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide, ultra dry, powder or crystals, 99.99% trace metals basis
Sodium ascorbate, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide, reagent grade, ≥98%, pellets (anhydrous)
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, suitable for HPLC, gradient grade, suitable as ACS-grade LC reagent, ≥99.9%