Milli-Q® IQ 7000 Water Purification System product details: Learn more
Review – Love this instrument | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jason Holland Brewer Science 
 Rating: 4.7 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review – The machine is amazing! | ||
|---|---|---|
| Marissa Goetz University of Iowa 
 Rating: 4.3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review – User-friendly system | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jules Hammond BeFC 
 Rating: 4.7 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review – Solid investment | ||
|---|---|---|
| Trevor Fassbinder SGS 
 Rating: 4.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review – Excellent product! | ||
|---|---|---|
| Kelly Harden North Texas Municipal Water District 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review – Great Product | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dan DeLuca Teknor Apex 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review – Cleans up water for HPLC and ICP-MS | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beverly Suffolk GOJO Industries, Inc. 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review – Great to use when making mobile phase | ||
|---|---|---|
| Julian Moriones Valent Biosciences 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review – Very affordable! | ||
|---|---|---|
| Paul Heney WTWH Media Inc. 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Austin Angus Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jessica Kern University of Wyoming 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Srinivasan Krishnamoorthy University of Pretoria 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| James Hauenstein Bausch 
 Rating: 4.3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Zia Nuss Indiana University Genetics Biobank 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Julie Chang University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| John Oberman Pentagon Technologies 
 Rating: 4.3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jack King Bayer Consumer Care 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sonia Moisa Auburn University 
 Rating: 4.3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cheri Goodall Indiana University 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Priya Ganguli California State University, Northridge 
 Rating: 4.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vincent Yu University of Houston 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jérôme Martinez bioMérieux 
 Rating: 3.7 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| James Fitzpatrick Washington University School of Medicine 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| qusay  al-Mutalibi moh of iraq 
 Rating: 3,3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dennis Murphy Purdue Pharma 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ross Brown SNF-Polychemie 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Christian Amason Florida Department of Agriculture 
 Rating: 4.3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Stephanie Wimpey EPA 
 Rating: 4.7 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Gyorgy Lur University of California, Irvine 
 Rating: 3.3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Yasemin Sancak University of Washington 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Justin Weigold Waters Corp 
 Rating: 4.3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Brian Gregory Samford University 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Lily T Georgia State University 
 Rating: 4.3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Abdul  Rasheed War World Vegetable Center 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rosanna  Delgaudio University of Naples Federico II 
 Rating: 4,3 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mike Airola Stony Brook University 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Russell Drago Pfizer Inc. 
 Rating: 4.7 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Review | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mary Beth McCarthy UConn Health 
 Rating: 5.0 Ease of use: After sales service: Value for money: *Note: The rating scale is base on 5 points being the highest achievable.  | 
Find more reviews at: www.selectscience.net.